Why we hate DRM: Yahoo music store to shut down and shaft customers who bought legal music
Repeating similar horrors from Microsoft’s MSN Music, Yahoo will shut down its Yahoo! Music and DRM servers—thus depriving customers of the right to enjoy the music on different machines in the original high-quality format.
Microsoft later backed off. But isn’t this all a perfect lesson for e-bookers who think they’re buying DRMed books rather than simply leasing them? Yes—Kindle owners included. Even if the gotchas aren’t as bad, they bound to show up. Look how Amazon’s main store squeezed out the Adobe format, herded people into its own Mobipocket and now wants them to buy Kindle-format books.
The library angle
"Once again," LISNews comments on Yahoo mess reported by Ars Technica, "this truly provides food for thought for libraries signing up for content services who cripple their wares with DRM. When they decide to leave, they can take their toys with them. Unfortunately, they can also take your toys with them too." Or just go out of business. Ask the librarians who bought Rocket eBooks and Gemstars.
"Protection" and eBabel: The twin toxins of e-bookdom
DRM and proprietary formats—the twin toxins of e-bookdom! And of music, too! The scary thing is that the big recording studios have actually been more progressive than the large publishers in understanding the folly of DRM. "Portection" is a great way to punish law-abiding customers and reward downloaders of pirated books. Quite rationally Amazon brags about selling nonencrypted MP3s. Time for it and its publishing partners to unshackle e-books as well and experiment with social DRM? Or is Amazon too much in love with short-term revenue from Mobi DRM to consider the long run?
July 25th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
Kids are most likely not to understand the need not to pirate. Kids are unlikely to be the target market for most books. Kids would rather play games than read. Listen to music than read. Any book a kid happens upon on the DarkNet is bound not to be passed along because it’s considered “junk.” Adults who put out hard cash for ebooks are not about to pass them around (that alleged statement from that alleged eejit librarian notwithstanding!). I’m not about to give someone a freebie of something I’ve paid bucks for. If someone can afford the hardware, they can afford the software too. Leakage of everything is possible. But ebooks will create more sales for some books that print book *returns*. Readers and *writers* are being punished here.
July 25th, 2008 at 7:51 pm
Always a typo…
>>>But ebooks will create more sales for some books that print book *returns*.
But ebooks will create more sales for some books THAN print book *returns*.
July 25th, 2008 at 8:22 pm
I own a Kindle but, at this point, I would NOT spend a lot of money on ebooks precisely because I’m tech savvy enough to know that you do not own anything that is encumbered with DRM.
I and my wife use the Kindle mostly to replace the stacks of cheap paperback books that we buy, read and give away. Beyond that it’s fun to scout around for free ebooks. There’s plenty to read out there in the world without paying ten bucks for a book just because its new.
Case in point, Tor just gave away, totally free of DRM, about 12 top notch Science Fiction ebooks as a promotion to publicize their new Website.