TeleRead: Bring the E-Books Home

News & views on e-books, libraries, publishing and related topics
October 14th, 2008

J. Gerry Purdy’s 15 requirements for an ebook reader

By Paul Biba

The article is fairly lengthy but I suggest you go over and read it.  His 15 criteria (each explained in detail) are:

1. Correct size

2. Instant on/off

3. Great (natural) user interface

4. High contract, high resolution, bright color display

5. Random access

6. Durability

7. Storage

8. Easy annotation

9. Easy access to the dictionary and synonyms/antonyms

10. Acceptable cost of device

11. Built-in wireless communications

12.  Acceptable business models

13. Broader distribution

14. Integrated animation and video

15. Acceptable digital rights management (DRM) and intellectual property protection

Digg us! Slashdot us! Share the news.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • TailRank
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Netvouz
  • YahooMyWeb

6 Responses to “J. Gerry Purdy’s 15 requirements for an ebook reader”

  1. What’s that sound in the Dilbert comic strip when the characters encounter something so DUMB their head bangs onto their desktop?

    Oh yeah.

    THUD!

  2. Acceptable price is what gets me here. I understand that 300-400 hundred dollars is steep for most people, I’m an undergrad working at a Pizza Hut so I don’t make anything, but I don’t believe that the price of an e-reader is as great when compared to cut-rate desktops and laptops($300-600), Ipods ($250-400), smart-phones ($200-600) and video game systems ($200-400). When also considering the price-point of video games for computers and systems like the Xbox, which run between $50-60 new, compared to the price of an e-book at $10-25. What I’m saying, in a long-winded way is that people pay a similar price for other electronic gear that e-book readers are priced at today and they are also paying more for video games than the cost of a book. The problem is not in the price, it’s in the importance people are placing in e-books. Of course, I’ve spent over 1200 in the past three years just on readers so I’m obviously not as affected by my low wage and high cost of readers. People on minimum wage will pay $600 for a new PS3 but they won’t spend 25 cents on a used paperback. It’s apathy for the product not a magic sell-points

  3. > 15. Acceptable [DRM]

    I assume he means “Support for non-DRM-infested content.”

  4. Dunno, its hard to argue with most of those point *individually* but collectively… Its easy to see how he ends up with a 2050 adoption timeframe.
    Biggest problem I see is he is defining a *single* device. Sorry but that’s not the way the world works; one size does not fit all.
    Even today there are *three* clear markets for ebooks, pulling the hardware in three seapate directions. The obvious result will be three separate form-factors/feature sets. And instead of having to wait til 2050 for broad adoption we’ll probably see it this next decade. It just won’t be on a single gadget is all.
    As is, we have had productive representatives for all three markets for years now and there’s plenty of people getting good use out of them; the only real limitation is this desire for a magic-bullet single dominating gadget that will serve everybody equally well.
    *That* is not going to happen any time soon.

  5. According to a newspaper report I read in 1962 or thereabouts, compiled from the prognostications of the Eminent, we would all by 2008 be:

    1. Working 20 minutes a week (tops, workaholics only)
    2. Having our every whim satisfied by robots
    3. Eating a single pill once a day to provide all our nutrition
    4. Riding around in hovercars
    5. Wearing Bacofoil suits
    6. Holidaying on Mars

    etc., etc.

    It’s fun to speculate about e-readers, but all you can really say about the future is this: “It hasn’t happened yet.”

  6. One very important requirement was missed:

    Long battery life and/or the ability to quickly recharge on-the-go.

Leave a Reply

This site is using OpenAvatar based on

Subscribe without commenting